1,091 words about my computer problems, CPAC, Beck, teh gehys, et al

I’ve been working on editing three books and writing another, and my eyes, finally turning into little bags of sand as my ergonomically unsupported wrists began to turn into feeble hooks, prompted me to spend all of $200 to upgrade my computer stuff. I bought a 20” flat-screen monitor, an ergonomic keyboard and a wireless mouse to dramatically improve my quality of life.
And for two weeks or so, they did.
Now – you can see this coming – I’m keying in letters on my ergonomically-correct keyboard while my wireless mouse sits patiently by waiting for orders, and behind the 15” Dell laptop screen sits my 20” Dell 20” flat-screen monitor.
==
At some point in January, I realized my body was having a toll taken on it, even as I tried to get back into my workout routine (yep, fully involved in P90X right now), and the problems stemmed from, when not P90-rolling, I was sitting in a quasi-comfortable chair staring at my 15” laptop screen, often for hours on end. Mind you, I’m not talking about sitting in a cubicle doing work – I’m talking about when I’m not working for money, but working for pleasure and the pursuit of money. Interspersed with that work for the pursuit of money, yes, I do quite a bit of Internetting, but the point is it’s my lifestyle and I don’t see it changing any time soon.
While I usually waste money, I considered a $200 investment into my ‘netting comfort something of an investment. I sleep on a mattress that cost less, and My Computer Chair was purchased for $20 back in the ‘90s, while my La-Z-Boy is a hand-me-down from my father, also about a decade old. For someone who writes and, when not writing, wanders around this here interweb for hours on end, I consider this a smart investment. I bought, in order: A wireless Logitech Keyboard with Mouse and the aforementioned Dell Monitor, and all were great for the primary purpose of writing and editing, and I’ve done a boatload of it in since purchased.
I spent last night in OhKaySee because I had a meeting, and when I returned home I promptly plugged the laptop (aka the brains of the operation) into the Newly-Purchased System, and while the keyboard and mouse work fine, the monitor now sits behind my laptop pissing me off.
The bags-of-sand eyes are already returning.
Once you get used to viewing anything on an HD 20” monitor, returning to the uncozy confines of a non-HD 15” monitor … suck.
The monitor works, as I’ve tested and re-tested and re-test-re-tested it. The problem, after a yoeman’s labor, is that the monitor does not detect a signal, and after multiple re-starts et al, it still doesn’t work as in it’s still not getting a signal. So infuriating is this is that, in spite of a vacation of sort from this site – currently occupied with content equal parts sadness, funniness and FB-ness, I have returned, taking a break from my writing, to gripe about it.
I’m at a loss. At the Internet hell that is Dell.com, there is no solution I can find to rectify the “no signal” business, and yes, Dell, I checked to ensure the monitor is plugged into the power outlet, and that the monitor is plugged into the laptop. Drivers are installed, and life is supposed to go on … in HD.
But it doesn’t. The original idea was I would power through my current writing project and then get back to my site, yet now I find it difficult to concentrate on anything other than the fact that I can’t figure out how to get my perfectly functioning monitor to … function perfectly.
So it is … I’ll continue starting and re-starting the laptop every 15 minutes until it recognizes the existential futility that I assume is an errant driver, makes it peace, and returns me to my HD glory. Until then, well, dammit.
==
If you were wondering, I have x amount of thoughts, since I’m breaking from my regularly-scheduled programming and posting something trivial:
First, the GOPers are erring in agreeing to this idiotic healthcare whatevertheyrecallingitnow thing tomorrow. No matter what happens, they’ll be spun into the ground. A good tactic to live by is this: when your opponent is attempting suicide, don’t do anything to stop them. I told dad that if there was a respectable GOPer out there (and there are, to be clear) every time TDL obfuscated his position or a position presented to him by a GOPer attendee, they would yell the Wilsonian “You Lie!” and walk the **** out.
Second, I hope it goes away, but hardcore social conservatives are starting to make hay about various gay groups suddenly taking an interest and a role in the Tea Party movement, and as a corollary, Conservative politics. I understand the pathos certain Social-Cons have about homosexuality, but I would advise them (none of whom read this site) to sit down and play nice. The gay community – more than almost any other community – has been rooked by TDL Administration, and they have the motive to be a vocal opponent of Donkeys in ’10 and ’12. This may pain certain people, but many gay people also happen to be Conservative – I suggest Social-Cons go throw stones at less helpful glass houses. When it comes to fiscal Conservatism, restrained spending, reduced taxation, strong national defense and Second Amendment dogma, if they are in line, I welcome Conservatism’s gay brothers and sisters more than any fussy auntie who would relegate their views inferior based on what they do behind closed doors or anywhere else. There is a forest and it’s composed of trees – forests, people, forests.
Third, regardless of what Glenn Beck said at CPAC or believes in real life, there is a big ****ing difference between GOPers and Donkeys. GOPers have failed me and those like me repeatedly, but if you have Conservative beliefs, we must work to giving them a hand up, not comparing them to those we despise. Glenn Beck (who I’ll be seeing, along with Sarah Palin on 3.13.10 in Tulsa) has his own agenda – I have no idea what it is, but in a rare case of Huck wisdom, CPAC was not Conservative by any stretch. There are many contradictions in that statement, but I watched as much as I could, and I sensed (as I did when CPAC allowed the JBS to have anything to do with CPAC) that CPAC went off the rails this year.
I forgot this add-on, so I'll add it, uh, on now:
I don't know what or what Toyota didn't know before it's recall issues became intergalactic news, but I will tell you this: I have yet to hear how many deaths have resulted from the accelerator/computer glitches supposedly affecting Toyota vehicles, nor have I heard how many injuries have been caused. I have heard - like you - about the half-dozen cases that have been the cornerstone of this - my words - manufactured outrage.
I find it strange that as the government assumed control of General Motors and Toyota continued to increase its market share; that Honda and Ford have both surged in the wake of the government takeover of GM and Chrysler; that suddenly, all three companies are having recall issues.
We live in a nation of approximately 310,000,000 people and even more cars. Cars fail - they are not perfect. People fail - we are not perfect. Maybe there is an issue with Toyotas and, to a lesser extent, Hondas and Fords, but I find it remarkable that GM, that shittily run, union-shop company, is having no such issues in the wake of its government takeover.
I drive a Toyota Yaris 3-door, one of the most economical cars on the market. Crash-tests show that in head-on collisions, it's an Epic Fail. When I'm done with my Yaris, I will buy another Toyota. They make better cars that last longer, drive better and are, excuse the term, more user-friendly. That the government is going after this company - HEARINGS! HEARINGS! HEARINGS! - not out of safety, but out of politics, is flatly despicable.
I've asked, looked, searched, and yet I can find no answer: compared to how many Toyotas are on the road versus vehicles of other auto companies in America, how many fatalities or severe injuries result from a) human error or b) mechanical failure? I remember when "60 Minutes" nearly sank Audi over similar charges, charges that years later were proved to be inconclusive at best and unfounded at worst, and I ask you this: which car company do you trust? The one being backed by the Federal government, or the one that has to prove itself through profit and market?
I'd buy another Toyota tomorrow - as god as my witness, I will never buy a GM or Chrysler product.
FWIW.













Reader Comments (4)
I'm a life-long Toyota fan and I also own a company that makes automotive components. We have conducted recalls in the past and each were voluntary. Meaning at great expense to ourselves we initiated contact the Department of Transportation and told them of the problem. How that massive, gigantic, bloated department runs is sometimes despicable but our master nonetheless. Being fairly intimately familiar with the recall process, albeit on a much smaller scale, the hoopla is sickening and in no way indicative of one company's manufacturing capability. These recalls are based on the most obscure of statistics combined with flawed human judgment. Toyota, as with all auto manufacturers, have voluntarily conducted numerous recalls when they felt a product was unsafe. Seldom has the government ever had to demand a recall. Perfectly safe cars would weigh 10,000 pounds and be unattractive, unusable, and unaffordable. This is all a statistics game. Much like aircraft. They have a decent idea how many people will die in a crash every so many million miles. It's called economic utility.
For what it's worth, I think Toyota would recall anything that is not genuinely 'reasonably' safe. The fact that this is a major news headline only confirms why I have no faith in the media and very seldom give them more than one ounce of my treasured attention.
Faulty Crash Sensors Force Chrysler To Begin "Safety Improvement Campaign."
The AP (2/25) reports, "Chrysler Group LLC on Wednesday asked the owners of more than 355,000 of its popular minivans to take them to dealers...to replace crash sensors that help to control the air bags." The company announced that "the sensors can crack and fail in 2005 and 2006 Town & Country and Dodge Grand Caravan models." But, Chrysler "is asking owners to wait until June to contact dealers because it needs time to distribute repair parts." The automaker is describing "the move a 'safety improvement campaign' and says it is not a recall. But National Highway Traffic Safety Administration spokeswoman Oliva Alair says the agency considers it a recall and is monitoring repairs to make sure they are carried out."
Another thought regarding any company who makes things that can kill people: if they are interested in making money, it serves them zero purpose to ignore flaws that could kill their customers. The safety features in automobiles were not created by government bodies, they were created by ingenuity. The unibody design of passenger cars, airbags, seatbelts ... the list goes on. BMW has innovated a device in headrests (themselves safety features meant to prevent whiplash) that has a propellant that ignites in a head-on collision, thus further minimizing a chance of whiplash/neck injury in a high-speed impact strong enough to deploy airbags. Volvo and Mercedes-Benz have for years been at the forefront of making cars safer than any govt entity could dream.
Previously obscure and quizzical, most people whose cars have floormats may notice that their floor mats are now "hooked in" to their vehicle's carpet. It never occurred to me why in the Ford Escape I drive for work and the Toyota Yaris I drive for non-work have those hooks - now we know: It's to prevent the floormat from making its way beneath the break and accelerator. There are dozens, hundreds of safety features in vehicle that weren't mandated by the government - it's in the best interest of companies who make cars for everyday usage to make them as safe as possible.
I'd add that this isn't just for everyday cars. The future of how vehicles handle and perform can be seen in the exotic car market. I watched a video awhile back at Jalopnik of a professional driver testing the traction control system of a Lamborghini Diablo on a track covered in snow. Lambo and Ferarri (and Porsche, to a lesser extent) are clearly not in most people's budgest, yet the systems they use for controlling their vehicles at high speeds in inclement weather eventually filter down to the everyday car market. Watching the driver navigate the Lambo with and without the traction control system was, well, breathtaking, in part because a Diablo is a beautiful vehicle, but also in part because unless one is a professional driver, a Diablo owner would be insane not to use the system (you can turn it on or off) in inclement weather. Come to think of it, you'd be insane to take a Diablo (or an Enzo) out in inclement weather at all - the point is that innovation isn't top-down, it's bottom-up - the extremes of any industry innovate and those innovations gradually make their way down. Just as seeing an airbag in a non-Volvo in the 1980s would be odd, I'd be surprised if in 20 years that every popular passenger car in America doesn't have some form of high-end traction control.
Finally, I noted in my update that I've found no numbers regarding fatalities in Toyotas. At the conservative site American Thinker, there is an excellent piece regarding these statistics. You can read it following the link below.
http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/02/congress_toyota_and_cafe_stand_1.html